This module explains how gold’s price is shaped by supply rigidity (slow, capital-intensive mine responses) and sector-specific demand across jewelry, technology, and investment. It then examines how financialization—via exchange-traded funds and gold-backed stablecoins—has broadened access and intensified demand, weighing the trade-offs between physical holdings and ETF exposure (liquidity, fees, tracking error, and custody risk). Using the “golden constant” framework alongside new empirical evidence, we assess how ETF adoption has influenced real gold prices. We analyze how the “weaponization” of the U.S. dollar and sanctions regimes spur some countries to reduce dollar dependence and de-dollarize, redirecting portfolio demand toward gold. Finally, we evaluate central-bank accumulation—especially by China and Russia—its implications for global reserves, and what this means for future demand and price dynamics.

This module examines how the U.S. dollar’s reserve-currency status channels global demand into dollar assets while creating the Triffin dilemma. It then analyzes how bilateral central-bank swap lines, sanctions risk, and deliberate de-dollarization efforts are reshaping reserve strategies and lifting official-sector demand for gold. We review Basel III’s High-Quality Liquid Asset (HQLA) framework—eligibility tests, haircuts, and liquidity horizons—and evaluate the case for classifying gold as Tier 1 HQLA alongside top-quality sovereigns. Finally, we assess the demand and price impact if such a designation were adopted, including likely balance-sheet reallocation by banks and central banks and plausible price paths for gold under alternative adoption scenarios.

This module examines how the U.S. dollar’s reserve-currency status channels global demand into dollar assets while creating the Triffin dilemma. It then analyzes how bilateral central-bank swap lines, sanctions risk, and deliberate de-dollarization efforts are reshaping reserve strategies and lifting official-sector demand for gold. We review Basel III’s High-Quality Liquid Asset (HQLA) framework - eligibility tests, haircuts, and liquidity horizons - and evaluate the case for classifying gold as Tier 1 HQLA alongside top-quality sovereigns. Finally, we assess the demand and price impact if such a designation were adopted, including likely balance-sheet reallocation by banks and central banks and plausible price paths for gold under alternative adoption scenarios.