Chevron Left
Back to AI for Education (Advanced)

Learner Reviews & Feedback for AI for Education (Advanced) by Kennesaw State University

4.6
stars
11 ratings

About the Course

This course expands on the AI for Education (Intermediate) course. Participants will learn quick ways to refine prompt engineering methods for assignments and course design that can be scaled to multiple levels of educational contexts. This course further provides straightforward and practical definitions, scenarios, and prompt engineering methods with real-time demonstrations in diverse educational learning environments. Participants will be provided tested methods for prompting an AI Assistant, such as GPT to yield useful, relevant, accurate, and ethical outputs. Learners will gain a clear understanding of how to collaborate with an AI Assistant and how to encourage students to do so in ethical ways. Knowing how to describe and collaborate with AI Assistants effectively and rhetorically is a vital skillset to successfully engage with students in all types of learning environments, from secondary to college levels. This course is a beginning step in learning these skills....

Top reviews

Filter by:

1 - 6 of 6 Reviews for AI for Education (Advanced)

By Jane K

•

Jul 9, 2024

This was an excellent class that provided a great deal of valuable information and then provided opportunities for practicing the skills learned. The peer feedback was helpful as well. I would definitely recommend this class to my colleagues.

By Kevin C

•

Aug 29, 2024

Excellent content and instructional delivery. It's a super valuable course.

By MARIANA R M

•

Nov 13, 2024

Very interesting and useful information, the professor was very good.

By Yaseen " R

•

Feb 17, 2025

Excellent content

By Shah F

•

Apr 4, 2025

Best course

By Belinda K

•

Oct 24, 2024

Often, the instructions for tasks and prompts are incredibly vague - and when "peer-evaluing", the guidelines are similarly vague. I had to submit several attempts just because there was no clarity on what the submitted assignment exactly should look like, and peer evaluators then were unsure which points to give if the rubric was not quantity, but quality. Some more clear structure, more scaffolded practice tasks throughout, and clarity in wording of tasks would help incredibly. Since this is a self-study class, it becomes very discouraging otherwise. Also that I had to wait for weeks to even have enough other people's work I could review was disheartening.