Learner Reviews & Feedback for Epidemiology: The Basic Science of Public Health by The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
About the Course
Top reviews
DA
Invalid date
I had no prior knowledge on epidemiology at all. But the explanations made it easy for me to understand everything easily. Learned a great lot of new things from this course. It was great!
DA
Invalid date
Very useful and comprehensive information. I warmly recommend this course to all the ones interested in getting a proper understanding of the terms, concepts and designs used in clinical studies.
1126 - 1150 of 1,214 Reviews for Epidemiology: The Basic Science of Public Health
By Ernest K
•Aug 16, 2016
Good course, worth taking
By YIYITIRE E
•Jan 26, 2021
Very Interesting course!
By shinto t
•Jun 8, 2020
legible and interesting.
By Nggada J
•Oct 5, 2015
Beautiful introduction
By Mohammad R
•Sep 3, 2016
gooddddddddddddddd
By Greysi C
•Mar 24, 2022
EXCELENTE CURSO!!
By Riya K
•May 29, 2020
Very interesting!
By Bernadette E
•Jun 25, 2024
Very informative
By Angelica C M
•Nov 17, 2022
Good and helpful
By Chukwunonye A
•Apr 11, 2017
Very good course
By Baluka C
•Jul 23, 2022
Good eye opener
By William A B
•Jun 21, 2020
Muy instructivo
By marina a
•Jun 2, 2020
thanks too much
By Josué R
•May 12, 2023
MERCI BEAUCOUP
By BEN S ( b
•Aug 14, 2021
fine course
By Francis O
•Aug 19, 2015
very uneasy
By Shuaibu M A
•May 4, 2024
Very good
By sajjad a
•Mar 25, 2023
Thank you
By Princess J
•Oct 20, 2020
Was good
By Amusan R A
•Oct 29, 2022
eni
By Tahira K
•Nov 26, 2021
Best
By Amulya J P
•Aug 19, 2022
good
By Konan D N
•Nov 2, 2020
bien
By Koustav M
•Jun 14, 2020
Good
By Suzanne S
•Jun 9, 2020
The subject matter was comprehensive and interesting. However there are two concerns I have regarding the class. The primary concern is how frustrating the tests were. Many questions referred to information that was not included in the lectures. Some of the questions may have been included in the additional materials, however since I followed the guidelines and only invested the time estimated (ten minutes for multiple documents) in reading and reviewing the supplemental information I may have missed the test question references. My suggestion is to review all the test questions so that they reflect the information related in the lectures and adjust the time estimates for the supplemental material.