Learner Reviews & Feedback for How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course) by École Polytechnique
About the Course
Top reviews
SM
Invalid date
The course is well structured that guides a scholar to construct a research paper step by step in a steady and sure way. I would definitely recommend the course for new research scholars.
SR
Invalid date
It was really helpful to me, I hope it will be useful to all researchers who are intensively working for publishing papers in journals. I thank all course instructors who handled the video sessions.
701 - 725 of 925 Reviews for How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course)
By Avvaru D
•May 2, 2024
Good
By Maria I B G
•Apr 3, 2022
good
By NELSON D C N
•Jun 1, 2021
good
By Wafa B
•Mar 20, 2021
Good
By KOTNI S 1
•Feb 22, 2021
nice
By Dhanush K
•Nov 2, 2020
good
By hema l
•Nov 1, 2020
good
By VIGNESH M
•Oct 20, 2020
Good
By Charef-Khodja D
•Oct 5, 2020
good
By Ra. P l
•Sep 30, 2020
well
By Balakumar.M
•Jul 30, 2020
Good
By Reethu B
•May 23, 2020
Good
By K v r M
•May 22, 2020
good
By Kushlendra K
•May 18, 2020
Best
By Asir M
•May 18, 2020
Good
By Harika B
•May 13, 2020
good
By Sanjay J
•May 12, 2020
Best
By Parrthipan B K
•May 5, 2020
Good
By Mahmoud E
•Sep 12, 2019
good
By NICOL P O G
•Dec 5, 2022
ok
By EL A Y
•Aug 21, 2022
.
By Alexandra R
•May 26, 2021
m
By Abdulrahman S A
•Jan 7, 2021
h
By Badie G
•Oct 17, 2020
The contents of this course are excellent and very important. The delivary was straight and simple. However, it's clear to me that this course was not updated for a long time. You see sometimes the Speech to Text function either delivers wrong representations or just misses the spoken words. The organizers can communicate with the instructors to correct the captions.
In addition, the last assignment need redesign. I was confused (and looks to me others are too) of what exactly was required. It makes sense to write your own checklist which acts as a summary and an actual tool to be used by the students later, but lack of a reference made it vague. For instance, one peer review actually put up an abstract of a paper, not a checklist. Another I found some introductory sentence like "this is a checklist for...", but then nothing is shown. Since we were asked to develop a table, that what you would expect to see, not what I saw for at least 3 peer review assignments in addition to my own Preview of the final assignment.
By Yara Y E
•May 5, 2020
This course is well-structured and informative. I learned everything from how to write a well laid-out scientific paper to choosing the appropriate journal and, finally, having it published. It added to my knowledge of basic principles and it drew my attention to aspects that I previously overlooked.
However, there were two factors that hampered my learning journey. Firstly, it was sometimes difficult to work out what some of the instructors say due to their foreign accents. As a result, some parts of the transcript below the video were not translated into the intended words. Secondly, I do not prefer to have my assignments corrected by other peers since they will never be as proficient as instructors giving the course. The peers who reviewed my assignments assigned grades that do not match the efforts, and gave poor remarks such as "good" and "done," with no comments or recommendations.
Nevertheless, I would love to thank Coursera and École Polytechnique for putting together this useful, interesting course.