SP
Invalid date
It covers general theory and insights of digital archaeology.
EH
Invalid date
Its a good course, i got to learn many things,, i really liked the technology part. 4 star because, the course was not upto the mark of what i expected
By Emma W
•Aug 16, 2016
Interesting content but the bad English grammar makes it hard to get through and sometimes simply incomprehensible. I dropped the course after the second week because of this.
By Leonardo M
•Feb 24, 2022
The English pronunciation of the speakers is pretty bad, and the slides are not very appealing (textwalls and so on). Quite unlucky, as the topic could have been interesting.
By Melissa D
•Oct 30, 2016
Course content is quite interesting, but it is a real pity that the english is so bad. Sometimes the lessons were very hard to follow and the quizzes often made little sense.
By Francine
•Jul 16, 2016
Very interesting course material, however, texts are often in such bad English that they are incomprehensible, and the staff does not react in the Discussion section.
By Leonid L
•Apr 3, 2021
Extremely difficult to understand due to the language issues in the videos and poor translation of the exams.
By Bruce B
•May 1, 2016
The material was very interesting but the lecturers were often very difficult to understand.
By Reema S
•Nov 6, 2016
I was very excited by the topic of this course, but quite disappointed when I finally started it.
The content of this course has little to do with its promising title.
In fact. the content lacks any coherency. There is no logical development of the course content - it's all disconnected facts told one after another.
Another factor is the delivery. I know the teachers are Italians & English is not their first language and that is fine. But they are just reading out the content - that's all. They are just passively reading the content from somewhere so it is hard to concentrate because the interactivity value is zero and their accent takes some time to get used to.
Both content and delivery of this course were disappointing even though I was (and am) really, really interested in this topic.
By Stella M
•Aug 16, 2021
Section 1 was good, but The videos of Section 2 are unintelligible. The instructor talks too fast, the language is not translated accurately and cannot be understood. Way too many names and places are given at breakneck speed in a monotonous tone, again with bad translation.
The first instructor for Section 1 videos sounded like he understood what he was saying, and made it fairly interesting.
At this point, I don't think I can continue, if it remains this bad.
By Tarık T
•Mar 26, 2023
How do I enroll from this course? I have no chance of erasing this course to appear in my courses. The language of the lecturer is very difficult for me to understand and this is too dry and way too didactic to be of interest to me. Thank you
By Martin C
•Sep 4, 2016
Interesting subject matter, but difficult to understand as a native English speaker. Very awkwardly worded and error-ridden tests.