There was very little actual content in this course, and I can't say I learned very much. In hindsight, I wish I hadn't paid for a verified certificate.

This is a good course but I was hoping to get lectures that teach the research methodology in greater details with MCQs as testing methods.

Not at all recommended. I would prefer rather book like Craft of research or a similar one instead of this course.

I didn't find it extremely useful. I was hoping for more details or information. The readings are good!

Contains worthwhile content though for all the hours spent, I didn't get as much as I should have.

The course is not well constricted to guide students.. it's only fill the gaps.

Incongruent instructions, feedback from peers was useless and unmonitored.

not realy satisfied i had to read external material to solve the assigment

It is very nice but we need more note and it should include thory

the course is very vaqu and superf even for a beginner level

thank you for your efforts but I think need more information

It was a great and enlightening course. I was so excited

Poor sound, low quality videos. Low engagement.

I think the course need to be more exhaustive.

The contents could have been better.

Not adding any valuable information

The sound was trible, so low

Thanks for you saporting

Not really detailed

so-so

yeah

Peer reviewing quality was very poor, and I didn't receive any feedback that I could learn from. There was a mismatch between the simplicity of the points in the videos and the complexity of the readings, and there was no assistance with the reading, e.g. supporting notes or videos discussing the readings. The discussion facility was not used for any actual discussion of the material, but was filled with requests for peer reviewing including at least one that said 'I'll give you a good mark if you give me one'.

The useful aspect was completing the assignments, which made me watch the videos and read the sources, but, as I say, there was no subsequent useful feedback.

I found this course to be quite unsatisfactory due to its lack of multiple-choice and multiple-select questions. Instead, the content appears to be a collection of subjective opinions from various researchers, many of whom do not seem to demonstrate a strong command of the subject matter. While they may indeed be experts, their approach to discussing key concepts is not as effective or structured as it should be. Incorporating concrete examples, relevant analogies, engaging anecdotes, interactive quizzes, and a structured grading system could significantly enhance the course’s quality and learning experience. Best wishes.

This course is not what it boasts to be.Just some random interviews are posted without doing any work on developing the content and structuring the presentation.Pier review system even makes it worse.I was expecting a more structured presentation rather than beating around the bush.Rather than giving reference to the materials you can make some efforts to create content of your own.If you are looking for course on research methods the course by university of Amsterdam is the best hands down.